Skip to main content

Some remarks on Talk-no-Jutsu

I recently saw a wonderful video analysis on Naruto.  This article is a tribute and response to that video.  The video especially focusses on Naruto's ability to convince people, which he calls "Talk-no-jutsu".  This is a parody of the way techniques are named in Naruto - Jutsu in Japanese means technique and no is a Japanese proposition.  I was extremely impressed by his analysis and it helped clarify a lot of things to me.  For example, I always hated the uselessness of Naruto in Gaara arc. The extended scenes of Naruto chasing Deidara crying "Gaara o kaese" (return Gaara) were irritating. I still think it is irritating. But, he wonderfully explained how it makes sense in the greater scheme of things.  However, there are parts in it where I have slight disagreements with him.  My major disagreement is with his claim that "Naruto's talk-no-jutsu failed" during the Sasuke retrieval arc.  In this post, I will explain why it should not be considered a failure.

As I explain, I would like you to have a close look at the way Sasuke's eyes change.  Anyone who has seen Naruto knows that a lot of stress is given on the eyes.  The phrase "sono me" (those eyes) or the statement "watashi to onaji me da"(you have or he has same eyes like me) is repeated so many times.  In the beginning, Sasuke does not even recognise Naruto's existence.  His gaze is completely cold and devoid of any expression.
Somewhere, in the middle of the battle, Sasuke starts recognising Naruto.  He goes as far as explicitly saying, for the first time in the anime, that Naruto is his best friend.  Further, he says "That is why there is value in killing you".
At this point, Sasuke had decided to kill Naruto to awaken the Mangekyou Sharingan (The condition to awaken this ultimate technique - a special eye - is that you have to kill your best friend.).  Though his reaction is still cold, he has recognised Naruto completely by now.  He has succeeded in the first step of talk-no-jutsu; to get recognised.  The second step in talk-no-jutsu is to impress the person by persistence (akirame-nai).  Again, he succeeds in this step too.
Notice the usage "someone like me".  This is something common for all the "villains" (or let us say the victims of talk-no-jutsu) in Naruto.  They do not consider themselves worthy of love or regard.  Naruto deems them worthy.  And that is the reason why his talk-no-jutsu becomes so efficient.  Also, notice that his eyes have changed yet again.  At this point, Sasuke is really conflicted.  In fact, he says something which suggests he semi-desires to go back to the village.
I have thought a lot about what Sasuke might have meant by these lines.  And this is how I think about it.  If this interaction had happened before Sasuke had given himself to the cursed seal, maybe he could have gone back.  We will never know. 

And finally, when Naruto lies unconscious, I believe Sasuke's gesture surely suggests immense love for Naruto.  He is a totally different person by the end of the battle.
Moreover, he does not kill Naruto, which he could have easily done at this moment.  He will also gain the Mangekyou Sharingan by doing this.  So, if Sasuke was a simple enough character for the claim "He cared only about power", he would have killed Naruto then and there.  But he is not.  He is a very loving and caring character as illustrated during the Haku fight or the Gaara fight.  Then he creates a lame excuse to protect his identity as an "avenger" - "I will not do as you want me to!  I will gain power my way.  I will surpass you my way!".    Remember he was completely prepared and tried his best earlier.  This transformation is certainly huge.  Naruto did manage to reduce the darkness surrounding Sasuke.  His talk-no-jutsu had an effect.  So, I do not consider this as a failure.

Moreover, even if you consider this battle purely as a battle, and not as talk-no-jutsu, I would not call it a failure.  Notice the fact that Sasuke kept insisting that you can't make a single scratch on my forehead protector.  But, towards the end Sasuke's forehead protector had a scratch in it and it is clearly shown to us.
So, saying that Naruto lost the battle is missing the point Kishimoto Sensei is trying to make.  Or so I feel.  I would also like to bring to attention a similar incident in a very similar anime Hunter-x-Hunter.  In this anime, Netero (a great master) is playing a ball game with the protagonist Gon.  Netero says he will only use one leg and one hand.  Gon does not manage to win the game, but he forces Netero to use both legs (or both hands) and Gon is overjoyed by this "victory".



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kettiyollaanu Ente Maalakha

Kettiyollaanu Ente Maalakha is the story of Sleevachan (Asif Ali), a good-natured individual ignorant of the ways of romance and sex.  Although he had avoided marriage until 35, he decides to marry to care for his ageing mother.  The rest of the movie is about his struggles in the journey forward. I would like to get a bit into the story as some of it begs discussion.  Thus, there will be some spoilers, but I believe they would not really spoil anything. Soon after fixing the marriage, he starts panicking.  He even confesses to the local priest that he is feeling stressed because of his ignorance.  However, the priest casually dismisses these worries.  After marrying Rincy, he is unable to initiate a physical relationship, causing even more stress.  Sleevachan's struggles were cracking up people all around me, and I felt, perhaps that was the director's intention.  Those very same scenes were, however, making me extremely uncomfortable....

Helen

Helen is the story of a girl's struggle as she is accidentally trapped in a life or death situation.  I did not enjoy the film because the girl's struggle disturbed me, proving that the movie was well made.  Anna Ben's (Helen) act was very convincing.  The movie certainly could have been better.  Certain cliches like Jayshankar's (Manager, Chicken Hub) character could have been avoided, especially because it does not add any value to the story.  The over-dramatised father-daughter relationship also falls into the same category.  In general, the bubbly character played by Anna Ben, in the initial segment of the movie, did not feel natural/convincing to me.  Although S.I Ratheesh Kumar (Aju Varghese) is a somewhat common trope in modern films, Aju Varghese's acting made it worthwhile.  By Source, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=62280395

The Good Place

The good place is a great entertainer - especially the first season. The climax of the first season was the highest point for me. Things did start going downhill (in my personal opinion) but the show managed to keep me hooked till the end. I certainly wanted to know how the show ends. However, I have some beef with the basic premise of the show - it is either flawed or they took the easy route. To discuss these issues, I will, unfortunately, have to divulge the intricate details of the show. So, needless to say, this post is full of spoilers . So, if you plan to watch the show, it would be better if you read this article after you finish watching the show. Else, the article might give a neat summary of the interesting ideas in the show. The basic premise of the show is that the criteria for deciding who goes to the good place are flawed. The main justification for the claim comes from two observations: For the last 500 years, no one has been to the good place (think heaven...