Skip to main content

Making sense of heroic acts in South Indian films

It is not uncommon to hear criticisms of unrealistic feats accomplished by heroes in South Indian films.  People are offended by the disregard to physical laws exhibited in these movies.  More often than not, the victims of these criticisms are Telugu films.  In this post, I attempt to explain, how to make sense of (or how I see) these unrealistic, physics-defying acts.  Hopefully, at least some of you would be able to better appreciate these films after reading this article.

Say, for example, we are watching a Superman movie and you see Superman flying.  Does that bother you? If yes, you can stop reading right now.  This article is most probably not for you.  If not, why?  I guess it is because the storyteller has given an "explanation".  Notice that this explanation need not be there in this movie.  Someone watching Superman is expected to know that.  Now, let us come to a South Indian film.  In contrast, it appears as if there is absolutely no explanation of this sorts and that is what puts off people.  Fair enough.  If you see these films as stand-alone movies they are quite non-sensical.  However, I claim, that is not how these films should be viewed.  

Then, how should it be viewed?  For example, if you are watching a movie starring Rajnikanth, you should be conscious that you are watching a "Rajnikanth movie".  Irrespective of the different names or setting the characters might have, IT IS THE SAME PERSON.  If it helps, you can consider them as different "avatars".   For a second, let us assume, this is the way it should be viewed.  Does it make sense now?  Perhaps not.  You might complain that Rajnikant's superpowers were never explained.  Again, fair enough.  But, observe one thing.  His earlier movies did not feature such feats.  His superpowers grew gradually over time, the jump between two consecutive films is not that high.  And thus, it makes sense to someone who has seen this "growth".  And that, in my view, is the right approach towards these movies.

How do I know this is the right approach?  To a large extent, this is just my opinion.  However, I can give some justifications, namely, indicators that suggest the fact that they are their real persona.  References to earlier films by the same hero are extremely common, irrespective of the language.  Just the other day I saw Sarkar and in it, Vijay repeats his famous "I am waiting" in pretty much the same way.  Many of these superstars have their special titles - Rajnikant is Superstar, Kamal Hassan is Ulakanayagan, Ravi Teja is Mass Maharaja, etc.  You can see references to this title in some of the films.  One example I remember vividly is Ravi Teja's film Bengal Tiger.  During his introduction, it is said, "friends maharaja antaru, public mass antaru, intlo akash antaru" (friends call him maharaja, public calls him mass, at home he is called akash).  The lyrics of the introduction song also allude to the same.  There is also reference to their lineage in many films.  The lyrics in Racha says "Konidela vaari kodukka", when talking about Ram Charan.   Konidela happens to be their family name or something similar.  In the film Bruce Lee, when Chiranjeevi saves Rakul Preet, she says Chiranjeevi and Ram Charan looks and talks the exact same way.  Notice, Chiranjeevi comes as Chiranjeevi in this film.  Rao Ramesh plays the role of the father to the character played by Ram Charan.  Finally, and most importantly, after I started watching these films with this approach, I was able to enjoy and appreciate them much better.  I am having a lot more fun.    

While I was discussing this idea with one of my friends, he pointed out to me that this phenomenon was quite common in the silent era.  For example, Charlie Chaplin is Charlie Chaplin in all his films.  This familiarity with the character saves time and effort needed to create a connection between the character and audience.  It is possible to directly plunge into the main theme.  

Finally, coming back to Superman, I have a question.  To believe the explanation in Superman, we have to trust that life exists in other planets.  Moreover, there exist intelligent life forms.  Further, one of them look exactly like humans and possess advanced technology.  Is it not easier to believe that there exists a human who can fly?  What purpose does the explanation in Superman really serve?      


Popular posts from this blog

Naruto; the saddest death

For me, the saddest death in Naruto, is undoubtedly, Yashamaru's death. Let me say a few words about why I think so. For me death by itself is not sad. I would in fact say that death is a blessing for the one who is dying. It is sad for those who are left behind. From that perspective I think Yashamaru's death is the saddest. Yashamaru was the only comforting figure in the life of Gaara. The moment it is revealed that the assassin who tried to kill him was that same Yashamaru was heart breaking. The way Gaara cries "Yashamaru.." still resonates in my mind. Loneliness is one of the central themes of the anime. And, that scene captures it so magnificently. One of the most touching moments in the anime. There are several other deaths for which I shed a lot of tears. Like the deaths of Haku or Zabuza or Jiraiya or Obito. But they truly shine through their deaths. As Jiraiya himself says "The true measure of a shinobi is not how he lives but how h

The Good Place

The good place is a great entertainer - especially the first season. The climax of the first season was the highest point for me. Things did start going downhill (in my personal opinion) but the show managed to keep me hooked till the end. I certainly wanted to know how the show ends. However, I have some beef with the basic premise of the show - it is either flawed or they took the easy route. To discuss these issues, I will, unfortunately, have to divulge the intricate details of the show. So, needless to say, this post is full of spoilers . So, if you plan to watch the show, it would be better if you read this article after you finish watching the show. Else, the article might give a neat summary of the interesting ideas in the show. The basic premise of the show is that the criteria for deciding who goes to the good place are flawed. The main justification for the claim comes from two observations: For the last 500 years, no one has been to the good place (think heaven

Kettiyollaanu Ente Maalakha

Kettiyollaanu Ente Maalakha is the story of Sleevachan (Asif Ali), a good-natured individual ignorant of the ways of romance and sex.  Although he had avoided marriage until 35, he decides to marry to care for his ageing mother.  The rest of the movie is about his struggles in the journey forward. I would like to get a bit into the story as some of it begs discussion.  Thus, there will be some spoilers, but I believe they would not really spoil anything. Soon after fixing the marriage, he starts panicking.  He even confesses to the local priest that he is feeling stressed because of his ignorance.  However, the priest casually dismisses these worries.  After marrying Rincy, he is unable to initiate a physical relationship, causing even more stress.  Sleevachan's struggles were cracking up people all around me, and I felt, perhaps that was the director's intention.  Those very same scenes were, however, making me extremely uncomfortable.  Stealing Naruto's words, &quo