Skip to main content

Accepting our disabilities

Kalyanaraman is a movie I really like and I have watched it countless times.  It is, of course, famous for its humour, which, however, is not the topic of this article.  

In the movie, Jyothirmayi is a mute.  After various attempts, her marriage is fixed.  The groom, however, elopes the day before marriage with someone else.  The girl's father requests some of the relatives present at the wedding if one of their sons could marry her.  But, they were evidently uninterested and giving excuses.  In fact, they were trying to push it on to each other. Finally, they suggest that it is better to find another "disabled" person for her.  This infuriates him.  He says "It is better if she remains unmarried.  I will protect her till I am alive and after that God will".

It is understandable that under such situations one might get hurt and angry.  I do not find fault in that.  At the same time, I feel the same is true about the other party.  I agree unsolicited advice can often be avoided.  Here, however, the situation is quite different.  They had tried in multiple polite ways to decline the marriage proposal. 

Now, observe the completely opposite portrayal of the same issue in another Dileep movie - Kunjikoonan.  In the movie, Dileep has a hunchback.  He has a strong desire to get married and goes to meet several girls.  One among them is a dwarf.  Within the hearing range of Dileep, the girl shouts "how can you consider marrying me off to a hunchback?  I would rather stay single for my entire life".  In this movie, the girl is ridiculed for being unable to see her disability.

In yet another movie, Lobster, disability is used as a criterion for choosing partners.  Lobster is a weird movie.  It is a movie about a dystopian future where people who remain single beyond an age are sent to a special camp.  One has to find a partner within this camp in a stipulated time, or face a cruel end.  A satire on the societal pressure to find a partner.  In this movie, almost all characters in the camp choose a partner with a shared disability.  The director's intention behind such a portrayal is still unclear to me.  Is he saying, people with similar disabilities might better understand each other?  Is it a jab at people's criteria for choosing a partner?  We can only speculate.   

While one need not specifically look for someone with disabilities, I feel, one should always try to accept our disabilities.  At the very least we should judge ourselves and others using the same scale.  Do not expect others to accept your disabilities if you are not ready to accept others' disabilities.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kettiyollaanu Ente Maalakha

Kettiyollaanu Ente Maalakha is the story of Sleevachan (Asif Ali), a good-natured individual ignorant of the ways of romance and sex.  Although he had avoided marriage until 35, he decides to marry to care for his ageing mother.  The rest of the movie is about his struggles in the journey forward. I would like to get a bit into the story as some of it begs discussion.  Thus, there will be some spoilers, but I believe they would not really spoil anything. Soon after fixing the marriage, he starts panicking.  He even confesses to the local priest that he is feeling stressed because of his ignorance.  However, the priest casually dismisses these worries.  After marrying Rincy, he is unable to initiate a physical relationship, causing even more stress.  Sleevachan's struggles were cracking up people all around me, and I felt, perhaps that was the director's intention.  Those very same scenes were, however, making me extremely uncomfortable....

Helen

Helen is the story of a girl's struggle as she is accidentally trapped in a life or death situation.  I did not enjoy the film because the girl's struggle disturbed me, proving that the movie was well made.  Anna Ben's (Helen) act was very convincing.  The movie certainly could have been better.  Certain cliches like Jayshankar's (Manager, Chicken Hub) character could have been avoided, especially because it does not add any value to the story.  The over-dramatised father-daughter relationship also falls into the same category.  In general, the bubbly character played by Anna Ben, in the initial segment of the movie, did not feel natural/convincing to me.  Although S.I Ratheesh Kumar (Aju Varghese) is a somewhat common trope in modern films, Aju Varghese's acting made it worthwhile.  By Source, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=62280395

The Good Place

The good place is a great entertainer - especially the first season. The climax of the first season was the highest point for me. Things did start going downhill (in my personal opinion) but the show managed to keep me hooked till the end. I certainly wanted to know how the show ends. However, I have some beef with the basic premise of the show - it is either flawed or they took the easy route. To discuss these issues, I will, unfortunately, have to divulge the intricate details of the show. So, needless to say, this post is full of spoilers . So, if you plan to watch the show, it would be better if you read this article after you finish watching the show. Else, the article might give a neat summary of the interesting ideas in the show. The basic premise of the show is that the criteria for deciding who goes to the good place are flawed. The main justification for the claim comes from two observations: For the last 500 years, no one has been to the good place (think heaven...