Skip to main content

Kumbalangi nights

I was not impressed by Kumbalangi nights.  I don't mean to say it is a bad film.  It is certainly worth watching.  The cinematography is extraordinary.  Also, it has its moments - nice little dialogues.  But with all that, it is just an average film, or so I feel.  As I had explained in a post before, people expect explanations when you express dislike.  Actually, I wouldn't say I dislike, but I did not like it as much as others - the people I talked to.  And, in this case, I think I understand some of the reasons.  And I will be sharing those reasons with you.

What do you feel when you hear someone saying "These impoverished people are so lucky.  Wish I had a skinny body like them"?  Movies like Kumbalangi nights elicit the same emotion in me.  The major problem poor people face is lack of money.  If you make a movie on the poor and completely take money out of the equation, that makes no sense.  Kumbalangi nights does precisely that.  Not even once had they showed them struggling for money.  On the other hand, Bobby is unemployed, but he is always so well dressed, travels in a bike, has plenty of money for alcohol etc.

Perhaps this can be better understood by an analogy.  It is clearly mentioned that their house is next to the "shit heap".  So most probably the place might be stinking.  It is highly likely that the place is infested with mosquitoes.  But when we watch it from the security of a theatre, we see only the visual beauty.  It is this romanticisation of the poor that I dislike.

Let me stress that, I by no means am trying to say that poor people can't be happy.  It just needs more nuance.  My favourite example is "Kakka Muttai".  I think the Tamil film industry does a much better job of portraying the life of the poor.  Even in Malayalam, some movies, like Kammattipadam, does more justice.  I am not against romanticisation.  "Maheshinte Prathikaram" romanticises the idea of Nostalgia and I loved the film.  There are types I like and types I dislike.  I feel this particular type is a bit patronising. 

Apart from this, I feel the storytelling is very lazy.  Although there were some interesting ideas, the two major twists fitting, these ideas into a coherent whole, - one before the interval and the climax -  felt very forced.  I will be explaining why I did not like the two twists so there will be spoilers ahead.

Character changes induced by dramatic incidents are less appealing (to me) than gradual change induced by many small incidents.  The transformative power of death, though used very often, appeals the least unless used exceptionally well.  In Kumbalangi nights, Murugan did not have enough screen time for his death to make an impact.  The impact had to come from empathy for Saji.  If the relationship between Saji and Murugan was well developed, the impact of the death of Murugan would be akin to the sudden loss of a friend.  However, the relationship between Saji and Murugan was not well developed and thus it failed to create the necessary impact.

The climax is worse.  I might have been more positive about the film if the film had a different climax.  A psychotic villain (reminiscent of The Shining), felt totally out of place.   The spookiness of Shammi's character comes from his craftiness.  For example, it was certainly wrong to throw Nylah and Bonny out of the homestay run by Baby Mol, without even consulting her.  But, Baby Mol was helpless because he was just following the rules.  He was really scary at this point.  He could have done something similar even now.  For example, he can just sulk till morning (as he had done for some time) and when his mother-in-law is awake, play the victim - "My well-intentioned actions are not taken well.  I am clearly not treated one among you.  I thought I will have a family once married. Turns out, I am still an orphan".  He would have had his sweet victory.  He had used his mother-in-law before and he could keep using.  Ending the story happily would be difficult, however.  I felt they were desperate for a happy ending.  In that psychotic state, why did he not kill the three women?  He was trying to kill everyone else.  Tying them up in such an elaborate manner did not go well with the psychotic behaviour at all.  His superhuman strength also seemed very unrealistic.  And finally catching him with the net was as cliche as it can get.

Finally, a lot of people consider this a huge attack on patriarchy - Shammi being a personification of patriarchy.  I think nothing can be further from the truth.  Clearly, his mother-in-law (and, I believe, most people in the audience) supported all his earlier actions.  His madness says nothing about the acceptability of those actions.  If anything, the movie reveals the difficulty in opposing cultural norms (like patriarchy).  Cultural norms are generally not enforced through violence but through fear of abandonment or ostracisation.  To illustrate: if Shammi threatens divorce for Simmy's actions, even if Simmy is OK with it, I doubt her mother would be OK with it.  To villainise Shammi they had to make him psychotic and violent.  By doing this they are just appealing to the prejudice against violence and madness prevalent in society.  Chivalry, a patriarchal value, especially condemns violence against women.  In fact, it can be argued that the film promotes patriarchal ideas:
  1. Shammi is a villain because he became violent towards the people he is supposed to protect.
  2. The film follows the usual trope of irresponsible men attaining manhood by taking up the responsibility of protecting/taking care of a woman.
  3. The film stresses man's role as a breadwinner.
So, if the movie was intended as an attack on patriarchy, then it is a very bad attempt.  Else, I guess people were just seeing what they wanted to see.



Comments

  1. It's totally another perspective of my thoughts. But what you've said is valid. Points taken.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks a lot Ram. It is so rare nowadays to see someone express difference in opinion with such dignity.

      Delete
    2. Beautifully articulated, Dippu. Even though my take was different, I have to admit that what you say makes absolute sense. I loved your review and the way you explained your opinion.
      Aparnoppol

      Delete
  2. Nicely argued. I too had problems with the climax and also was not fully convinced that this movie is an attack on male chauvinism. My main reason for not being convinced was Shammi was shown as having a mental disorder and in a way the story justified his ego and chauvanism as a result of his illness.
    Your point about the glossy depiction of poverty is valid too.
    But to be honest, I thoroughly enjoyed the movie because of the four brothers. I loved the chemistry between them. I had written an article about it (https://medium.com/@writewords/the-brothers-napoleon-f44d8359c128)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks :). I enjoyed your review too, more than the movie. I liked the parallel you drew with Brother's Karamazov. Your analysis of Saji's character was also interesting.

      Delete
  3. Thanks for the feedback

    ReplyDelete
  4. it is mentioned quiet often that saji won a lottery earlier and so the many assets you notice could be a product of that

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dress, money for alcohol etc cannot be a product of that, right? Also, as I mentioned, it is the romanticisation of their life that I strongly dislike

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Naruto; the saddest death

For me, the saddest death in Naruto, is undoubtedly, Yashamaru's death. Let me say a few words about why I think so. For me death by itself is not sad. I would in fact say that death is a blessing for the one who is dying. It is sad for those who are left behind. From that perspective I think Yashamaru's death is the saddest. Yashamaru was the only comforting figure in the life of Gaara. The moment it is revealed that the assassin who tried to kill him was that same Yashamaru was heart breaking. The way Gaara cries "Yashamaru.." still resonates in my mind. Loneliness is one of the central themes of the anime. And, that scene captures it so magnificently. One of the most touching moments in the anime. There are several other deaths for which I shed a lot of tears. Like the deaths of Haku or Zabuza or Jiraiya or Obito. But they truly shine through their deaths. As Jiraiya himself says "The true measure of a shinobi is not how he lives but how h

Android Kunjappan Ver 5.25

Android Kunjappan is a movie about loneliness at old age, but with many twists.  The movie is the story of Bhaskara Poduval and his loving son Subrahmanian (Chuppan).  Chuppan being educated and ambitious find it difficult to lead his life in rural Kerala.  Bhaskara Poduval, on the other hand, does not want to leave his home town.  Upon getting a lucrative job in a Japanese company, Chuppan leaves to Russia.  Initially, Chuppan appoints a couple of home nurses (one after the other) to take care of his father.  But, they all end up being comic disasters.  Finally, he brings a trial robot made by his company to take care of his father.  The rest of the movie is a story of companionship between man and machine.        Generally, in movies, the suffering of the elderly is caused by children who are complete jerks.  Such people certainly exist and it is worthwhile to portray their story.  However, it is important to realise, that often the elderly feel left out even under the care of wel